The “right to repair” movement, which promotes laws enabling people to fix their own electronic gadgets, is becoming more and more popular worldwide. Over the past few decades, this movement has emerged as a result of growing dissatisfaction with the manufactured barriers that prevent product owners from doing independent repairs on their own equipment.

A recent report stated, “Imagine that just a few years ago, you spent over a thousand dollars on your laptop, but now it barely holds a charge.” You’re stuck to an outlet without a fresh battery, which is extremely inconvenient and defeats the purpose of a laptop.

Even though your old laptop still functions well, you feel compelled to spend an additional $1,600 on a new one after learning that a new battery is impossible to install in the first place. Whether it has to do with a phone, laptop, or automobile, this is actually a rather common event.

Even if the discussion has heated up recently, it’s crucial to understand that this circumstance did not develop by happenstance. Planned obsolescence, the production of subpar goods with a shorter lifespan to encourage replacement purchases, and repair charges that are more than the cost of purchasing a new gadget are all concerning business practices.

These actions not only hurt consumers but also worsen the growing issue of electronic waste. As of 2019, 53.6 million metric tons of e-waste were disposed of; estimations put the total amount of e-waste at 75 million metric tons by 2030.

Many consider the right to repair as a step toward a more circular economy, one based on reuse, even though policy has been sluggish to follow up.

Read more: https://theeducationview.com/